Forums → Forum Games → Count to 100: Games Chat
| 78613 | 55023353 |
The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!
HOW TO PLAY
1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.
CORE RULES
No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.
ADDiTiONAL RULES
No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.
COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".
END GAME
Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!
SCOREBOARD
bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD
MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.
2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.
USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2
LAST TWO WINS
50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]
51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]
- 78,613 Replies
1. AH! S*** IT'S DANGEROUS! RUN TO THE ELEVATOR! RUN!
Also, @PLGuy IMO, your lozerfac3 roast was, IMO, lacking compared to your first. What do you think of my second roast, considering I probably won't get SirLegendary's opinion?
5. ^ What Kat just said, even if we get to 100 boss can decide we lost due to spam.
@sciller45 Yeah, I kinda failed with flow this time :-P and lozerfac3 has a perfect flow so I'm probably gonna lose. But at least I could roast some1 I don't like xD As for your feedback, better ask Legend in the thread. I think you did better than previously. But it was very short. I think you build strong punchlines.
6. Should we restart then? How are these things usually handled?
7. Well, we know that you can escape the spam limit as long as it fits to the conversation. I'm not sure, however, about your post because it was after Kat told you about that rule. But I think that it fits enough.
8. Still, I think two little posts aren't that bad. It says multiple 1 or 2 word posts is too much in the OP
10. Looks like the gods of weather hate me. I won't see the eclipse because of rain. And the past few days the nights were clear :'(
1. Here, I'll make the decision to restart easier for you guys. Just helping out!
1. Thanks Moe! I don't know what we would do without you!
Also, clouds. ******* 'em. They deserve to die. *******s.
2. I don't want to annoy you, so I won't say how great does it look like. Full is here at about 1:40, maybe clouds will be gone by then in your place.
5. Party? Good night? Why not invite me? I'm fun at parties!
Especially when I talk about mortality, existentialism and our pending doom on this small speck of rock in a vast, meaningless universe which we would be exploring, if we were not born a few thousand years too early, And what is a few thousand years in the grand scale of the universe, time spans which not a single mortal being could truly comprehend. [INSERT LONG, PHILOSOPHICAL RANT HERE]
7. Good morning! HA HA! Take that!
Man, with the loopholes I find, I should become a lawyer!
8. Hello is less problematic. I could become someone who simplifies complicated things - if only I didn't do the other way around most of the time.
You must be logged in to post a reply!