ForumsWEPRTeen Pregnancies

266 41037
sushihair
offline
sushihair
153 posts
Nomad

Just like the posts about Abortion or Homosexuality,i want to know what you guys feel about this.

  • 266 Replies
donpiet
offline
donpiet
755 posts
Peasant

it's their decision


yeah so they should decide whether to keep the baby or not. according to what is best for them and the future child.
IPwnU2Day
offline
IPwnU2Day
395 posts
Nomad

If a girl gets pregnant for whatever reason there are 3 options.

1. Get an abortion

2. Give the baby up for adoption.

3. Keep the baby.

As a teenager options 1 and 2 are the best, but which of them is mroe of an ethical decision.

thisisnotanalt
offline
thisisnotanalt
9,821 posts
Farmer

but which of them is mroe of an ethical decision.


Depends on the quality of the adoption centers and how long she's been pregnant. I count abortion as murder when the baby can potentially survive outside the womb - which is around 5 or 6 months, I'm pretty sure. Though 4 months is still iffy - I'd say the first trimester is the only ethical time to get an abortion, because then the fetus is still, well, a fetus.
hailman670
offline
hailman670
359 posts
Nomad

With the laws in place about teenage sex i think it makes people do it more. if your told not to do something, what are the chances you will do it? take the laws away and the worry of teen pregnancies might not be an issue.

GamesArmor
offline
GamesArmor
890 posts
Nomad

With the laws in place about teenage sex i think it makes people do it more. if your told not to do something, what are the chances you will do it? take the laws away and the worry of teen pregnancies might not be an issue.


Agreed. But I also think that the law has more of an effect telling you to do something than your parents XD
Talo
offline
Talo
945 posts
Nomad

Laws are made to keep stupid people from swallowing their own tongues.

Xavier1
offline
Xavier1
671 posts
Nomad

With the laws in place about teenage sex i think it makes people do it more. if your told not to do something, what are the chances you will do it? take the laws away and the worry of teen pregnancies might not be an issue.


How old are you? I ask this because this sounds like the opinion of someone who is about 13 or youner. As you talk to people around 16 and over you'll find that law or no law it wont matter. The fact is people either go out and do it with whoever they possibly can because it feels good or they do it with their partner because it's a sign of intimacy. Personally if there were no laws on it and it wqasn't frowned upon I would be alot happier, as a guy in relationships it would make staying over at my girlfriends house etc alot easier because the parents wouldn't care. Trust me dude, sex has nothing to do with rebellion.
Green12324
offline
Green12324
4,097 posts
Peasant

but which of them is mroe of an ethical decision.


I would say that an abortion after 3 or 4 months isn't any good. The baby would actually vaguely know what's going on then. And like Alt said, they could survive outside the womb after that.

take the laws away and the worry of teen pregnancies might not be an issue.


I think they'd do it more. They're not just having sex to rebel against the law, they're doing it because they want to. Lift the laws and it's going to increased ten times.
IPwnU2Day
offline
IPwnU2Day
395 posts
Nomad

I'd say the first trimester is the only ethical time to get an abortion, because then the fetus is still, well, a fetus.


I agree, I actually wrote an essay about that once.

As for adoption centers there are interenet organizations that go around the country. Most likely you'd be able to find one needing mother out of about 350 million people.
Talo
offline
Talo
945 posts
Nomad

I would say that an abortion after 3 or 4 months isn't any good. The baby would actually vaguely know what's going on then. And like Alt said, they could survive outside the womb after that.


Children can't survive on their own until the age of 5 or 6. I think you should beable to abbort up until age 2.
donpiet
offline
donpiet
755 posts
Peasant

Children can't survive on their own until the age of 5 or 6. I think you should beable to abbort up until age 2.


this is technically possible. the practice just changes the name from abortion to murder
IPwnU2Day
offline
IPwnU2Day
395 posts
Nomad

Children can't survive on their own until the age of 5 or 6. I think you should beable to abbort up until age 2.


If you would actually do that then you have to be the most psychotic person I've ever had the displeasure of meeting.
Talo
offline
Talo
945 posts
Nomad

If you would actually do that then you have to be the most psychotic person I've ever had the displeasure of meeting.



I kill people for a living. What makes you think their age matters to me.
donpiet
offline
donpiet
755 posts
Peasant

I kill people for a living. What makes you think their age matters to me.


do you even think sometimes before you post?
Somers
offline
Somers
1,532 posts
Nomad

Children can't survive on their own until the age of 5 or 6. I think you should beable to abbort up until age 2.


I kill people for a living. What makes you think their age matters to me.


Talo your really twisted you know that? And why the hell would you kill a two year old? Thats just sick, thats not abortion thats murder.

I think they'd do it more. They're not just having sex to rebel against the law, they're doing it because they want to. Lift the laws and it's going to increased ten times.


Sex= a protest against the system...but enough with the 70s rebelling stuff
Showing 196-210 of 266