well if any of u r familiar with the law of conservation and mass, then u know that it states that matter cannot be created from nothing, or completely destroyed. so evolutionists say this, then turn around and say the big bang created the universe as we know it. WTF!!?!?!?!the universe went from non existent to existent in a fraction of a nanosecond! and where did the bigbang come from? nothing? nope, because if the law of conservation and mass is true, then the bigbang isnt. simple...
Well your "guessing" here. So Its all just a guess of the beginning of time. Just pick and choose what we want to believe.
My attempt to explain the "observed event" you questioned was a guess at Mage's intentions when he described that observed event. It had little to do with the current argument or reality as a whole.
It's not just a fifty-fifty coin flip, or a random guessing game, either. I seriously doubt that you've actually comprehended the previous posts we have established in the hopes that you will eventually begin thinking from a scientific perspective, unblinded by your faith.
So I'm being "babysitted" just because I was asking a question on what he believes? How would I think to myself on what he believes I don't know him. You need to be careful before you judge someone's intelligence, cause you don't even know me.
I wasn't directly insulting you, however, I've noticed that you've inquired the details of many scientific observations we have postede. Do you really need us to explain every single piece of evidence we use against you, because I doubt that you will be able to explain your own evidence as we have.
MageGrayWolf I have seen that video along time ago it is very outdated.
We only perceive about 3-4 of them
3
We could never perceive a higher dimensional object in it's entirety we would only see a portion of it in our dimension as it passes through. You should read about M-Theory in my post before. You will learn that branes are made of string that can vibrate in all dimensions. So when they collided to create our universe it was a multidimensional collision therefore all dimensions are part of the universe.
2. belief that is not based on proof: He had faith that the hypothesis would be substantiated by fact.
MageGrayWolf I have seen that video along time ago it is very outdated.
Yes I realize the video is dated but I thought at least some of the concepts behind it were still valid.
We could never perceive a higher dimensional object in it's entirety we would only see a portion of it in our dimension as it passes through. You should read about M-Theory in my post before. You will learn that branes are made of string that can vibrate in all dimensions. So when they collided to create our universe it was a multidimensional collision therefore all dimensions are part of the universe.
Okay if these particals aren't moving in and out of our perceived spacial dimensions then what do the current theories suggest is going on?
okay,so you looked at two,but dont you understand that one is what i am talking about,i mean,i can prove that my will to make my friends happier has fact,right?
okay,so you looked at two,but dont you understand that one is what i am talking about,i mean,i can prove that my will to make my friends happier has fact,right?
So you place your trust in something that probably doesn't exist? Or are you believing God exists without any proof?
I wasn't directly insulting you, however, I've noticed that you've inquired the details of many scientific observations we have postede. Do you really need us to explain every single piece of evidence we use against you, because I doubt that you will be able to explain your own evidence as we have.
Yea well I kinda do need explaining. I mean I do believe in science, just not theories of how life began. Everyone has their own ideas about different observations and I like to hear their own personal ideas before I can see anything. And heck, I might learn something. I must say I've learned a lot already arguing with atheists. Most of them have really good reasons and evidence which trying to back up. God, is really hard to understand because no one can think like He does. And I too, do have my doubts from time to time. Cause its just to great to even think about. Anyways, people do have their own beliefs about scientific observations/ theories.
If god the big bang created everything, than all of the universe would slowly go back to that origional starting point (the point where the big bang happened) because of the fact that tings are attracted to the point of origon.
If god the big bang created everything, than all of the universe would slowly go back to that origional starting point (the point where the big bang happened) because of the fact that tings are attracted to the point of origon.
Do you really need us to explain every single piece of evidence we use against you,
Of course that's preferrable in a debate, no matter what you say you want to back it up as thoroughly as possible (even though I don't do that all the time), that's what's expected in a debate about a topic like this.
Yea well I kinda do need explaining. I mean I do believe in science, just not theories of how life began.
The process scientists used to arrive at the theories you do believe in is the same process they used to arrive at the theories you don't. So what makes you inclined to believe one theory and not the other? With that said I think it's good you want to question a theory every step of the way. It's what makes science work. I do wish you would use this same level of inquiry on religion though. By just accepting that God did it and then turning around and questioning every last bit of science you create a double standard.
But unfortunately we aren't experts in science so our answers might not always be the best.
With that said I think it's good you want to question a theory every step of the way. It's what makes science work. I do wish you would use this same level of inquiry on religion though. By just accepting that God did it and then turning around and questioning every last bit of science you create a double standard.
Ok. I've told you earlier in some posts that I do doubt God at times. But why would I question my side of the argument?
Because if you don't, the only side to question it will be the other side, and why should you support your side without a reason? Plus, not doing so makes you sort of a hypocrite.