ForumsWEPRDebate: Jesus is Lord

372 53823
cddm95ace
offline
cddm95ace
165 posts
Nomad

I believe that Jesus Christ was the Son of God and died on the cross for all our sins and did miracles his whole life.

What do you believe, and why?

  • 372 Replies
BlackVortex
offline
BlackVortex
1,360 posts
Nomad

Holt, do you seriously believe half the stuff your typing?
Just a quick serious question..

Very true. I spent the first half or so of my life on the other side. I was a Christian, helped teach bible study, and assisted with youth fellowship. Most of my family was very religious and many still are, being involved in leadership and missionary work. This is why I say I've already heard the arguments against my current position because I myself have made them all, as have my family members. Pastors and Ministers and several nuns and a Theologian. All family members who've I've debated religion with.


Well, I can only imagine the atmosphere at Christmas time over there XD

How did you argue for it tho? did you never stop and think... what the hell am I talking about? I've never been religious, don't think I could without feeling stupid.. altho some of my family are, never brought anything up to them about it, keeping the peace XD
I guess I've always been a bit of a sceptic on nearly everything, too much so to even read more than a few lines in the bible without cracking up.
holt24
offline
holt24
1,133 posts
Nomad

A lie is a lie is a lie is a lie, no matter what the purpose was. And besides, his "sin" was hitting a rock multiple times, even if he was walking on eggshells he would still mess up.


No he did not lie I already explained how it would have been a lie if he siad the contrary. Also he disobeyed God I consider that the least God could have done.

First off, I wouldn't torture someone I allowed in my house just because they don't believe in me. Second, a closer analogy would be allowing someone into your house but not showing any evidence for yourself, and then faking evidence of the contrary, like fake shadows of other people, then finally torturing the person if they didn't believe in you. And then torturing the rest of there family for infinite generations. How is that fair again?


God has given us plenty of evedince if you chose not to look at it then that's your problem. So God has every right to have us go to Hell as we have all sinned and chosen not to beleive in God even though God has warned us that would happen.

Yeah, cause the holocaust makes free will soooo worth it. Not to mention the horrible atrocities committed during the Crusades, the Inquisition, the witch trials, slavery, murder, ****, child abuse, spousal abuse, arson, the attack on the WTC (shall I continue?).


So the contrary to the sins humans have commited is to not have us created at all? I would much rather have been created and then murdered or even tortured and still go to heaven than not be created at all. Our life on earth is relatively short so any pain we have here is greatly made up for in heaven.

Oh, and what's this "heaven" that everyone keeps talking about? You know, it's mentioned 691 times in the KJV Bible, yet only described twice? And that's at the end of the Bible, in Revelations. So what is heaven like? Hmm? What is this place you all are trying so hard to get to?


The place where we spend eternity with God and I can't imagine a better place.

Yeah, you lose your free will, which is soooo important that God created evil just so we could have it while we are here on earth, yet not so important that we keep it when we get to heaven. Makes perfect sense.


This sums up my thoughts on heaven and free will.


But you are taking these "issues" as facts. When scientist disagree on the facts, they do an experiment than etc. Youd think an omnipotent omniscient being who's followers claim to have a personal connection with him would be able to get his word out more effectively...


To you it may seem like he did a bad job of getting the word out there but for others including me I couldn't have thought of a better way without making the evedince so conclusive we have no choice but to beleive.

Any way I have to go but good discusion.
314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

No he did not lie I already explained how it would have been a lie if he siad the contrary. Also he disobeyed God I consider that the least God could have done.


He lied. Simple as that. In fact, why didn't he say the opposite? Wouldn't he want one of his beloved chosen people to get to the promised land? And really, you are saying it is just punishment for hitting a rock incorrectly? He wasn't even trying to spite Yahweh, he just wanted to be sure its working, like you hit the on button several times on your T.V.

God has given us plenty of evedince if you chose not to look at it then that's your problem. So God has every right to have us go to Hell as we have all sinned and chosen not to beleive in God even though God has warned us that would happen.


Care to name any? And why do some people admit there is no evidence, but state you need faith? Once again, you thing Hewett would communicate better...

So the contrary to the sins humans have commited is to not have us created at all? I would much rather have been created and then murdered or even tortured and still go to heaven than not be created at all. Our life on earth is relatively short so any pain we have here is greatly made up for in heaven.


Why not just create everyone in heaven in the first place? Why put "free will" and "sin"? It doesn't make any since. And on the contrary, most people would have wished to never be "created" over eternal torture of the worst kind...

The place where we spend eternity with God and I can't imagine a better place.


Have you even read the biblical description? I think just the noise would make me evaporate if I were forced into such a hideous place! And one song, over and over and over, would make my head explode after the first week.

To you it may seem like he did a bad job of getting the word out there but for others including me I couldn't have thought of a better way without making the evedince so conclusive we have no choice but to beleive.


Yeah, a great job...Showing the account to illiterate desert dwellers in the middle east instead of someone you could rely upon, like China were more people could right, or any other place they could be better recorded?
Alexander116
offline
Alexander116
107 posts
Shepherd

to 314d1,

No you lose the want to disagree with God basicly you don't want to sin anymore. You would be like God making you perfect.

Thus you lose your personality and free will...


Think of it this way, we make our decision on earth. The ones that choose Gods path go to heaven and have all lose temptation to sin, which believe me would be awesome, and those who choose not to follow God go to hell, which makes me quite distraught to be honest, but anyway anyone who might want to change there mind once they got to heaven probably wont be going to heaven anyway.

And here is a vary general stament that I'm sure a lot of you arn't going to like very much, If the bible appears to contadict itself or say something that isn't true then that is not because it is wrong it is because we are misunderstanding it or not grasping the full picture.
314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

Think of it this way, we make our decision on earth. The ones that choose Gods path go to heaven and have all lose temptation to sin, which believe me would be awesome, and those who choose not to follow God go to hell, which makes me quite distraught to be honest, but anyway anyone who might want to change there mind once they got to heaven probably wont be going to heaven anyway.


Ohhh so he is like Stalin and Hitler!(Had to say it...) "You can choose to be with me or against me, if you are not with me than I will kill you."...Perfect resemblance.

And here is a vary general stament that I'm sure a lot of you arn't going to like very much, If the bible appears to contadict itself or say something that isn't true then that is not because it is wrong it is because we are misunderstanding it or not grasping the full picture.


Or it could be actually contradictory!
Like when it gets its numbers mixed up. How exactly could that be a misunderstanding?

AJKhlkajkldjfakljflkejreljaldjKJJKDAKJKJDkdlajfdlj;:JDLKJDJKFDl

That sentence makes perfect since, and will tell you how to live forever, you just don't understand it enough to interpret it. No, no, it couldn't actually be wrong, take my word for it, I have been praying to the FSM for hours of this thing, I couldn't possibly be wrong...
MRWalker82
offline
MRWalker82
4,005 posts
Shepherd

o he did not lie I already explained how it would have been a lie if he siad the contrary.


Actually your 'explanation' is what would have been truthful, not a lie. What was done was dishonest, what you described would be honest.

God has given us plenty of evedince if you chose not to look at it then that's your problem.


Give me one piece of solid evidence as to the existence of God.

I would much rather have been created and then murdered or even tortured and still go to heaven than not be created at all.


And what about hell? Would you still be as happy with the atrocities committed in the world if you got to go to hell? After all, the overwhelming majority are going there, so really a whole bunch of people are suffering, not just now, but for eternity, so that God can have a small portion of us up there in heaven worshiping him for eternity. That doesn't sound like it was worth it to me.

The place where we spend eternity with God and I can't imagine a better place.


Really? And so what's it like there?

If the bible appears to contadict itself or say something that isn't true then that is not because it is wrong it is because we are misunderstanding it or not grasping the full picture.


You know, I can almost buy that. However there is one issue with such an idea. In such an instance as we must admit that we don't understand what it's saying, how can we then understand ANYTHING that it's saying. After all, it is the foundation of Christianity. If we can't understand it then how can we know that Christianity is right? We can't. It's just that simple. If you don't know if your first premise is correct then the rest of your position is invalid. That's just the basics of logic.
Alexander116
offline
Alexander116
107 posts
Shepherd

Did you guys know that there were chariots bones and soldiers armors preserver in the middle of the red sea! surely you cannot denies this the only way that these Egyptian chariots and men could have been deposited there would be the biblical red sea crossing here is conclusive evidence of a miracle!

http://www.bibleprobe.com/exodus.htm
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=19382

MRWalker82
offline
MRWalker82
4,005 posts
Shepherd

Did you guys know that there were chariots bones and soldiers armors preserver in the middle of the red sea! surely you cannot denies this the only way that these Egyptian chariots and men could have been deposited there would be the biblical red sea crossing here is conclusive evidence of a miracle!


Ever think that it could have been the result of a naval ship sinking at sea? That happens a lot you know. Also, I found no information that dated these artifacts and until such time as a date could be established we don't even know how old they are or if they are even egyptian in origin. Simply because something points in the right direction doesn't make it a fact in support of a claim. It is pure conjecture until the source and age and cause of their placement can be verified.
Alexander116
offline
Alexander116
107 posts
Shepherd

To MRWalker82,

As I was unable to respond to your last statement on the appropriate page I will put it here, If what you say is true about C14 than all other Radio Isotope dating methods are flawed also as this same thing could happen with other Isotope atoms as well.

To any mods,
this is the last thing that I will post on the topic I don't mean to stir up trouble and I don't want to get banned.

NoNameC68
offline
NoNameC68
5,043 posts
Shepherd

As I was unable to respond to your last statement on the appropriate page I will put it here, If what you say is true about C14 than all other Radio Isotope dating methods are flawed also as this same thing could happen with other Isotope atoms as well.


Fine, you're right. Carbon Dating is absolutely flawed and science is completely wrong.

This still does not prove that God is behind everything. Lack of evidence is not evidence.
samy
offline
samy
4,871 posts
Nomad
MRWalker82
offline
MRWalker82
4,005 posts
Shepherd

As I was unable to respond to your last statement on the appropriate page I will put it here, If what you say is true about C14 than all other Radio Isotope dating methods are flawed also as this same thing could happen with other Isotope atoms as well.


/facepalm

Seriously, read some science books. Go to school. Get an education. Better yet, go to a museum and ask to talk to the curator or someone. Talk to the scientists there that are in charge of the fossils and have them explain these things to you because I am done. Your logic fails, you have a pitifully limited understanding of science, and you refuse to look at any evidence which contradicts your religious beliefs. Please just stop talking to me. If you continue with your willfully ignorant and belligerent banter I fear I may become irritated. Thank you.
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

No he did not lie I already explained how it would have been a lie if he siad the contrary. Also he disobeyed God I consider that the least God could have done.


You analogy made no sense what so ever. All he would have had to do is say he wasn't getting in Didn't need to elaborate. But instead he lied to him saying he would get in. Yes it was a lie since he didn't get in.

Another way God could have gone about it was to state that if you sin you don't get in rather then promise he would get in. This way if he did sin he wouldn't get in just as God said, if he walked on eggshells and didn't sin and got in this would again be what God said would happen.

How is it I can come up with wording so as not to lie but God couldn't?

The place where we spend eternity with God and I can't imagine a better place.


So your idea of paradise is spending an eternity kissing Gods @$$?

The Bible for beginners (Part 2)

To you it may seem like he did a bad job of getting the word out there but for others including me I couldn't have thought of a better way without making the evedince so conclusive we have no choice but to beleive.


So your saying having verifiable evidence is a bad thing? Even if we proved without a shadow of doubt that he existed, this would still not effect our free will to decide whether we want to follow this being or not. So your argument that he requires faith to protect free will is completely fallacious.
Also if he had done a perfect job (the only type of job I would expect from a supposed perfect being) then it wouldn't seem like a bad job to anyone.

I'm agnostic, i think there is some sort of god, but not one we really know about


Just wondering but have you heard of something called deism?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism

Think of it this way, we make our decision on earth. The ones that choose Gods path go to heaven and have all lose temptation to sin, which believe me would be awesome, and those who choose not to follow God go to hell, which makes me quite distraught to be honest, but anyway anyone who might want to change there mind once they got to heaven probably wont be going to heaven anyway.


Free Will - "God" style: a gift?

It's like God is a mafia boss asking for extortion money, wait I think I heard this analogy before.

God the Mafia Boss - The Atheist Experience 607

This still does not prove that God is behind everything. Lack of evidence is not evidence.


Very true.

Okay I said i was going to post this but the Carbon 14 thread got locked so I guess I will put it here since I did say I would post it again.

Evidence for evolution + debunkings of creationist arguments.
29+ Cases for Macroevolution
An Account of a Debate with a Creationist
An Account of the 1993 Creation Conference
All About Archaeopteryx
Ancient Molecules and Modern Myths
Arachaeopteryx: Answering the Challenge of the Fossil Record
Are Mutations Harmful?
Attributing False Attributes to Thermodynamics
Bombadier Beetles and the Argument of Design
The 'Burdick Print'
Creationism and the Platypus
Creationist Arguments: Java Man
Creationist Arguments: The Monkey Quote
Creationist Arguments: Neandertals
Creationist Arguments: Peking Man
A Creationist Exposed: Gish
Creationist Whppoers
Creationists and Pithecanthropines
The Creation Research Society's Creed
Darwin's Black Box: Irredicule Complexity or Irrepoducible Irreducibility?
Digit Numbering and Limb Development
Dino Blood Redux
Dinosaur Footprints in Coal
Dinosaur Valley State Park
Do Human Tracks Occur in the Kayenta of Arizona?
Debate: Edwards vs. Aguillard
Entropy, Disorder and Life
Evidence for Evolution
The Evolution of Improved Fitness
The Evolution of the Woodpecker's Tongue
Five Major Misconceptions About Evolution
Fossil Hominids: The Evidence for Evolution
Fossil Hominids: Lucy
Genetic Algorithims and Evolutionary Computation
Geologic References in the Paluxy Controversy
How Good are those Young Earth Arguments: A Close Look at Dr. Hovind's List of Young-Earth Arguments and Other Claims
Horse Evolution: Hyrocatherium and Hyrax
IRC Graduate School Catalogue and List of Publications
Images of Neandertals
Information Theory and Creationism: Spetner and Biological Information
Jury-Rigged Design
Kansas Evolution Hearings
Lucy's Knee Joint
A Matter of Degree: Carl Baugh's Alleged Credentials
Observed Instances of Speciation
On Archaeopteryx, Astronomers and Forgery
On the Heels of Dinosaurs
The Origin of Whales and the Power of Independent Evidence
An Overview of Dinosaur Tracking
Peking Man and Homo erectus
Plaigiarised Errors and Molecular Genetics
Publish or Perish: Some Published Works on Biochemical Evolution
A Response to Ashby Camps 'Critique'
Response to Casey Luskin
A Response to Wayne Jackson
Review: Bones of Contention
A Review of IRC's Impact Article 151
A Review of NBC's 'The Mysterious Origins of Man'
Review: Science of Today and the Problems of Genesis
Review: The Image of God
Sauropods, Elephants,Weightlifters
Sea-Monster or Shark?
Scientific Creationism and Error
Scientists Challenge Claim for 60,000 year old Mungo DNA
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, Evolution and Probability
Suspicious Creationist Credentials
A Tale of Two Teeth
The Taylor Site 'Man Tracks'
Ted Holden's Frequent Questions Answered
Ted Holden's World
The Texas Dinosaur/'Man Track' Controversy
Transitional Vertevrate Fossils FAQ
A Visit to the IRC Museum

Lets Test Them: Evolution vs. Creationism
Irrefutable Proof of Evolution- Part 1 (mtDNA, ERVs, Fusion)
Proof of Evolution - Part 2 (Summation)
Proof of Evolution - Part 3 (Atavisms and Fossils- censored)
How Evolution Works- Introduction (Part I)
How Evolution Works- Forces (Part 2)
How Evolution Works Part 3- DNA
How Evolution Works Part 4- Mutations
How Evolution Works Part 5- Natural Selection
How Evolution Works 6- The Constraints of Evolution
How Evolution Works 7: Speciation
Evidence for Evolution, Part I
Evidence for Evolution, Part II
Evidence for Evolution, Part III
Evolution IS a Blind Watchmaker
The Evolution of the Flagellum
Evolution of the Bombardier Beetle
How Evolution Causes an Increase in Information, Part I
How Evolution Causes an Increase in Information, Part II
6 -- Natural Selection Made Easy
7 -- The Theory of Evolution Made Easy
deserteagle
offline
deserteagle
1,633 posts
Nomad

oh my... Mage drop a link nuke!

That has to be the biggest list of sources I've seen on AG..

Your like the Shin of links..

Hypermnestra
offline
Hypermnestra
26,390 posts
Nomad

Damn Mage do you keep a list of links in your closet or something? HAO?!!
And I'm gone for like a day and 17 pages sprout up...*sigh*.

Showing 346-360 of 372