Hey Ash, something's wrong with Tinychat's messaging system, saying that they couldn't recognize my registered account, so I'm just relaying my thoughts here instead...Was there any way that that Beta background could be stretched, or does Tinychat only do tiled backgrounds? I'm not wanting to be picky here or anything, but....
Although you did a fantastic job on ArmorGamesitizing the chatroom :P
My problem with CT is its like God fighting for power. Everyone there is an admin and almost none of them should be.
I didn't stretch the background because the image is so small. If anyone can find a larger one, that would be great.
Why don't you just ask one of the web developers? I would go through the CSS and find one but i don't have time right now. Plus i would have to ask them for permission to use it after i find it anyways.
I didn't stretch the background because the image is so small. If anyone can find a larger one, that would be great.
I don't see a problem with the background there. It's great, but I don't pay attention to it much because the chat box is now larger.
Everyone there is an admin and almost none of them should be.
Yeah, I don't understand why Knight made everyone an Owner there. It makes me not want to go there because many of them power-trip and when I try to make people members or unban them they just ban them again, so it's rather irritating. There are some that should remain an owner, but not all of them there.
It's good that everyone is an owner. This way when somebody (cough cough) decides to ban people as soon as they leave, we can be sure that when the banned people come back there will be somebody to unbann him.
This way when somebody (cough cough) decides to ban people as soon as they leave, we can be sure that when the banned people come back there will be somebody to unbann him.
Gaboloth, that makes no sense. If everyone is an owner there, then a main owner bans another owner when they leave, then a normal owner can't unban them.
Yeah, I don't understand why Knight made everyone an Owner there. It makes me not want to go there because many of them power-trip and when I try to make people members or unban them they just ban them again, so it's rather irritating. There are some that should remain an owner, but not all of them there.
I will admit it. I power trip. I shouldn't be an owner, but knight won't let me stay member. I dunno why. But I mean I don't STAY power trippin. As soon as I ban someone I go back and unban you like 2 seconds later. Just so you get the fact you are being stupid and/or annoying.
It's good that everyone is an owner. This way when somebody (cough cough) decides to ban people as soon as they leave, we can be sure that when the banned people come back there will be somebody to unbann him.
If the people who should be owners were the only owners, then we wouldn't have the problem of stupid bans.
What the.....? Dude, it would be easier if no body banned anybody in the first place. Believe it or not, some of the owners are responsible. But some just ban people because they are idiots, which I do not really respect, because I act the same on there as I do on here. And I do not get banned.
CT has higher standards than AG when it comes to idiocy. CT doesn't like idiots gumming the place up, so the idiots are kept away.
Hey guys, I thought this thread was about tiny chat? Guess not. As I said, I like both, and I'm not going to get into this argument or whatever you want to call it.