ForumsWEPRThe World War III Theory

400 67178
roydotor2000
offline
roydotor2000
344 posts
610

World War I and II are futile to the might-be incoming war, the third World War.
You might laugh this time, but it will happen. Due to the recent events of the 21st century, it will happen. Some of the events are: 9/11, Sabah crisis, and N.K.'s declaration of war. So be prepared. I think it would be a nuclear war. But cyber warfare is more likely than the former.

[quote]"Wars will subside, but war can't be prevented" ---------- Anonymous

  • 400 Replies
Nerdsoft
offline
Nerdsoft
1,274 posts
680

Oil wars are usually very localised, because they're over idiotic dictatorships which have made the mistake of not co-operating with the West. A good example of this (and people will bash me for this) is Iraq; Dubya might have had his own reasons, but for Blair and the rest it was about oil. That was a farce, though.
In terms of water, we won't likely run out (it's not being consumed, just recycled as it were), but distribution is an issue. We could go to war over it (and it wouldn't be as localised as oil wars), but I think MAD would still triumph. More topically, what do you think about Ukraine?

09philj
offline
09philj
2,880 posts
3,160

Ukraine?


We will stand and mumble angrily at putin.
Ronokar
offline
Ronokar
4 posts
2,995

>> "Oil wars are usually very localised, because they're over idiotic dictatorships which have made the mistake of not co-operating with the West."

Your reason is the reasoning of a dictator. Since when is not co-operating with the West a justification to start a war? You think the West has the right to dominate other countries? That's horrible to those who don't live in the West.
Doesn't the West have enough resources themselves but refuse to use them before they deplete the resources of other countries? Don't you know that the US still has massive amounts of raw oil within their own borders? When the oil resources are depleted in other countries the US can monopolize the last remain oil... causing even more poverty and causing governments to get desperate. Acts while being desperate are rarely good for survival.

>> "A good example of this (and people will bash me for this)..."
Most of us live in a free country in which the freedom of speech is protected.
You are as much entitled to your opinion as any other, no matter how smart, good, ridiculous or cruel your opinion might be. It's unfortunately certain that some secret service(s) and companies will use it to set up a profile about you and determine the potential threat you might be based on your comments (as they do with everyone).

---------------

I do however agree that World War III will be because of greed. Could be oil, could be land or whatever. Or the reason made public is to beat the next "axis of evil" as the republic president of the US once called the unknown target. It's a word someone would use to describe his/her opinion about something or someone. It could be a harmless group or it could be the resistance against the oppressor, who become scapegoat for the next war.
Justified resistance is hardly tolerated by the US when it's against the US. No matter what, if it gets on wrong terms with the US it will be war or assassination. The truth is and will always be cruel. US senators called for assassinations before... that's uncivilised behaviour. In my opinion the US will be causing what will become the next world war. Of course, I hope they won't because I hate all kinds of war, violence, torture, rape, gun ownership, mutilation, spying or fighting in common.

I do like whistleblowers. They are brave employees who risk their lifes and their job and maybe also that of their relatives and friends to bring corruption, illegal activities, spying, ignored murders or whatever to the attention of the world (note: with world I mean more than only the US). Sure their will be calls of uncivilised people to assassinate them as they damage national interest. The question however is why would that damage national interest if whatever a country is doing is not against international law and is not an act of war or whatever dark schemes should never be publicized. However if the country does do something like that it sure damages national interest and such actions should never be done. So uh... they reap what they sow!
The dark side of the US is still not fully known... so there could also be something in there which would cause the world war III...

MattEmAngel
offline
MattEmAngel
7,836 posts
4,340

You are as much entitled to your opinion as any other, no matter how smart, good, ridiculous or cruel your opinion might be.


And, on the Internet, you are to expect factual documents/events/statistics that may prove your opinion wrong.
Nerdsoft
offline
Nerdsoft
1,274 posts
680

Your reason is the reasoning of a dictator. Since when is not co-operating with the West a justification to start a war? You think the West has the right to dominate other countries? That's horrible to those who don't live in the West.

I never said it was justified, I just mean it's a mistake because you get bombed flat.
Nerdsoft
offline
Nerdsoft
1,274 posts
680

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bh_WNdJCAAAN5A7.jpg
The prime minister has begun preparing Britain's vast reserve of frowns to aid the people of Ukraine..

roydotor2000
offline
roydotor2000
344 posts
610

The prime minister has begun preparing Britain's vast reserve of frowns to aid the people of Ukraine..


Is this true?
Nerdsoft
offline
Nerdsoft
1,274 posts
680

Yes. We will frown the Russian Federation into submission. Unless they stop giving us gas.

Kennethhartanto
offline
Kennethhartanto
248 posts
7,980

Do you really think an act from 1 puny nation is enough to "frown" Russians to submission? because i don't, not even if that country is US.

Russians have many interests in doing what they done to Ukraine in Crimea. after giving all of their nukes to Russia, they are pretty much defenseless. if you ask me, the only thing that would really frown them is if other countries threaten them with a full blown war, complete with nukes and stuff

HahiHa
offline
HahiHa
6,902 posts
21,110

I don't think we will actually start a war because of the annexation of Crimea to Russia. Russian troops marched into Crimea, but there was no fighting. The way Putin acted is of course reprehensible, hence why the West insists on their &quotunitive" actions; but there is no reason to attack or whatnot. Besides, The US and Europe do not form a very unified front which could successfully oppose Russia; Europes interests with Russia are bigger than the US'.

roydotor2000
offline
roydotor2000
344 posts
610

So, Ukraine will never regain its navy.

Nerdsoft
offline
Nerdsoft
1,274 posts
680

Frown, verb. Defined by the Merriam-Webster's English dictionary as:

to contract the brow in displeasure or concentration

Humour, noun. Definition:
jokes, funny stories, etc., of a particular kind

jokes

That post of mine was one of those. :[
HahiHa
offline
HahiHa
6,902 posts
21,110

That post of mine was one of those. :[

Wait wait.. are you saying I can not use my frowning powers to subdue people around me? ...that would explain why I still haven't got my cool drink and foot massage...
roydotor2000
offline
roydotor2000
344 posts
610

Hey, guys! A new weapon system will be introduced in the US Navy. Do you think this will face action?

Kennethhartanto
offline
Kennethhartanto
248 posts
7,980

What new weapon? the modular shotgun? the new grenade launcher? please elaborate

Showing 271-285 of 400