ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78377 46072137
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,377 Replies
saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
594 posts
Shepherd

25. If I remember correctly, I think I saw sims 4 on sale for as low as $5. You can also get it on EA play, although I personally hate subscription services like this for games since you can't always finish a game in a specified amount of time. I'd much rather pay something upfront (up to $200 for Warcraft for example) and have access forever.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
310 posts
Bard

26. Aint no way a game could send you back 200 big ones.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
594 posts
Shepherd

27. True but if the game is huge enough it might worth it, although you'd have to find some way to preclude its being shut down if its a multiplayer game.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,775 posts
Chamberlain

28. There are games that I've certainly got $200 worth of time and quality out of, but if you actually asked me to pay $200 for that game.... That'd be a no from me

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
594 posts
Shepherd

29. Would you mind sharing TheMostManlyMan (in a post after this one of course)?

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
310 posts
Bard

30. putting this here so we don't have to restart the count because

No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. p1 p2 p1 p2.
I wonder what GAME it is.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
594 posts
Shepherd

31. Its a FUN game called Count to 100: Challenge of Endurance.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,775 posts
Chamberlain

32. There are a few, I've played an unholy amount of CSGO (like 1,300 hours) and at least a couple hundred hours+ in each Elder Scrolls 3 - 5, as well as around 500 hours in Civilization 5. All great games that I've definitely got $200+ worth of value out of, but you'd have a hard time convincing me to spend $200 on any of them

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
310 posts
Bard

33. Ah yes CSGO and Elder scrolls, with $200 worth of value. Now when you say value I would think you're talking about in games items. CSGO seems like a good game but its not for me.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
594 posts
Shepherd

34. Best of all CSGO is free to play.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
310 posts
Bard

35. "free to play" you know you gonna end up spending 600$ on wh o knows what i that game.

Tsjawatnu
offline
Tsjawatnu
60 posts
Constable

36. I've heard F2P CS:GO is overrun with bots unfortunately

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
310 posts
Bard

37. not the only game with bots... #save tf2

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
594 posts
Shepherd

38. Are these bots impossible to beat?

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
310 posts
Bard

39. if you think you could kill bots with every hack then gl with that.

ps: I thought that us counting 12 numbers in 3-ish days was not allowed but im dumb and it is

Showing 76036-76050 of 78377