ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Mods Allowed To Count

78396 46139675
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,892 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,396 Replies
saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
598 posts
Shepherd

4. Unfortunately, I don't see any way around it.

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,778 posts
Chamberlain

5. Sad though it is, at least we have another player to speed things back along

Mattchstick
offline
Mattchstick
137 posts
Nomad

6. We're gonna make it to 100 again so Gantic has to update the original post.

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
302 posts
Prince

1. You are not allowed to make non-number posts. I will reset it again because it would be pointless to go to 100 and have it invalidated due to an early mistake

sciller45
online
sciller45
2,854 posts
Justiciar

2. You're right for resetting. Spoiling can only be on purpose, and
A) It probably wasn't
B) Going to 100 then would've meant Hal being invalidated for the count.

Well, look at that! Actual progress on Ruffle! An unexpected, but not unwanted development. Ah, literally!

Mattchstick
offline
Mattchstick
137 posts
Nomad

3. Happy Friday and also Almost Christmas, Aaaaaaah

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
598 posts
Shepherd

4. Point conceded, but you need the official full game rules to understand why. By the rules on this forum post the Count would still be valid.

disastermaster30
offline
disastermaster30
302 posts
Prince

5. If you want to be pedantic, it could be argued that he did include the number "1" in his comment. However, he probably did it unintentinoaly and this could create problems down the line. That's why I called for a reset. There weren't many numbers anyway.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
313 posts
Bard

6. It was a small count so it doesn’t really matter lol.

Mattchstick
offline
Mattchstick
137 posts
Nomad

7. The important thing is that we believe in ourselves.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
598 posts
Shepherd

8. Btw why aren't the most official rules the rules listed on this forum. That would make everything a lot less confusing.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
313 posts
Bard

9. They are tho Wdym. It says the rules above!!!

Mattchstick
offline
Mattchstick
137 posts
Nomad

10. The rules? Have you seen the AG discord?

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
598 posts
Shepherd

10. The rules above refer to a more official set of rules not posted above. Why not (other than Gantic being dead perhaps) just edit the original forum post and post the most official rules above?

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
598 posts
Shepherd

1. AAAGGGH! Not that again. Restarting the count for a double count. I cut, paste, and refreshed before posting too (always a good habit).

Showing 76321-76335 of 78396