Forums → Forum Games → Count to 100: Mods Allowed To Count
| 78425 | 46959989 |
The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!
HOW TO PLAY
1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.
CORE RULES
No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.
ADDiTiONAL RULES
No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.
COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".
END GAME
Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!
SCOREBOARD
bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD
MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.
2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.
USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2
LAST TWO WINS
50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]
51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]
- 78,425 Replies
23. @kalisenpai you're right. Not saying it's a bad topic, it's good to be aware of these things. It just seemed to come out of nowhere is what I was saying.
24. Welp, as I said, it's what I'm currently studying, so it was not 100% random XD (at least for me).
That reminded me of good old debates on CT100. People were pleading us to stop talking about poverty in the world and Marxist prophecies.
How could we ever forget that debate XD
25. @kalisenpai sorry for a big lateness! I'm only now. Tomorrow you could tell me the time you'll be on Discord, I can look there almost whole day. BTW, do you want me to join some Discord, like the *ekhm* unfiltered AG?
No, we couldn't. That debate was serious at that time. We weren't laughing at world's problems at all. Maybe people didn't plead, but some were angry for disturbing the peace of CT100. But others were joining, and that was the point. Maybe the place wasn't the most appropriate but the goal was positive. ;-)
26. It seems to me that's a debate for the WEPR section. But who am I to judge?
27. @dragonmaster10902 You judge this well XD That's exactly what mods said to us... after quite some answers to our topics. That's another thing - to join the discussion, they had to break counts.
28. @PLGuy, I could go online until noon or so.
BTW, do you want me to join some Discord, like the *ekhm* unfiltered AG?
Dude, you can do whatever you want XD. But I think that server is somewhat dead now.
And about the discussion, yeah, some people weren't happy that we talked about heavy stuff on CT100 XD
31. @kalisenpai I asked because once you sent me a link. And it can't be more dead than CT100 Discord? XD
@AmyClyne I'll hold off congratulations until they tidy up that ranking - -'
@Magic_Spoon the balance of the universe got disturbed and weird things happened to AG ranking.
@Majestic_Fish Duke of the Deep... Is that a fitting title for your Majesty? :-P
32. Deep what? Deep phrases that shall me remembered throughout the history, like some that absolutely don't make sense?
33. Hm. Duke of the Deep... Mayhaps, King of the Corals or Oligarch of the Ocean (Oligarch? Nah). Emperor of Eels? Baron of Blobfish? Viceroy of the Waters? Prince of the, erm, piranhas? Paddlefish? King of the Krill?
Eh, none of them will ever sound as good as Baron of Blood? Eh? Eh? EEEeeh? *aggressive nudging*
34. Why don't you say Bloody Baron? Oh wait that title was taken, my bad...
35. That ghost from Harry Potter? @Majestic_Fish can do better than that.
LOL paddlefish - yet another cool fish.
36. I don't know what to add so I'm just gonna say that vaccines don't cause autism and that that rumour was created by an article signed by Andrew Wakefield, in which he said that one specific vaccine caused autism. The thing is that he made up the data and he did it because he had developed another vaccine for the same disease and wanted money.
37. Thank you, @kalisenpai! Autism is a condition you are born with, external factors like vaccines have nothing to do with it! And @PLGuy, I can see why people would get mad about that. It would tick me off, I can tell you that. Also, am I seriously the only one whose rank hasn't been screwed with? I see Amy's back to Princess again since nine hours ago, and I haven't moved from Jester...
You must be logged in to post a reply!