ForumsForum GamesCount to 100: Games Chat

78643 56313531
Gantic
offline
Gantic
11,891 posts
King

The original "This Thread is Currently About" is back! Yes, it's Count to 100!

HOW TO PLAY

1. Count by ones from 1 to 100 in 100 consecutive posts according to the Core Rules.
2. Restart the count from 1 after:
a. a Moderator (or an Administrator) makes a stopping post (post without counting) if users and Knights are counting..
b. a user or Knight or Warden makes a stopping post (post without counting) if Moderators and Administrators are counting.
c. breaking a core rule, spamming, or cheating.
d. reaching 100.
3. Announce why you restart the count so other counters don't get confused.
NOTE: For the time being, Moderators are allowed to help Users count, so as long as the other rules are observed you do not need to restart the count if you see a mod count. However, if a Moderator makes a stopping post, i.e. a post without counting (not the same as a non-count post since they're technically different teams), it is considered an interruption and the count will restart.

CORE RULES

No mistakes. A count must start from 1 and increase by ones up to 100, save for exceptions noted.
No double-counting. No counter may count two consecutive numbers.
No back-to-back counting. No two counters may alternate for more than three consecutive numbers.
Okay: P1 P2 P1 P3
Not Okay: P1 P2 P1 P2
Okay: P1 P2 reset P1 P2
No editing. No counter may edit their post. If an edit tag shows on a count, the attempt is forfeit.

ADDiTiONAL RULES

No "spamming". Please don't post only the number and please don't post gibberish, either.
Multiple one- or two-word counts may also disqualify a count.
No "cheating". This shouldn't need to be said. Counting to 100 doesn't count if you cheat.
This is an exercise in teamwork, not rule bending.
No "spoiling". Don't mess with the count. Posts should start with the correct number.
Posts with no numbers should be ignored. See also: No non-counts.
Posts with intentional mistakes should be ignored.
No "spilping". If this is your first post in this thread, please post "I'm new and here to count to 100!"
No non-counts. No counter may post without a counting number or make a post without bolding that number if that counting number is not at the start of the post.

COMPLETE SET OF RULES
Please refer to the complete set of rules for additional information and examples of what is valid or invalid.
DiSCUSSiON THREAD
Please also check out the discussion thread for new gameplay or rule proposals or general discussion on the gameplay and rules of "Count to 100".

END GAME

Once you reach 100, you start this Sisyphean task all over again back at 1. Users should notify the Commissioner of the Count (HahiHa) that the count reached 100 and the Commissioner will review it to make sure there were no mistakes or cheating. If there were no mistakes or cheating, then the users who took part in the successful count to 100 will get a shiny new Quest!

SCOREBOARD

bold = counted 100, italics = previous winning participant, [#] = # of total wins, (#) = # of times counted 100
FULL SCOREBOARD

MODS - 2 WINS
Highest Count: 15!
1. 9! - 3865 (2533) pages / 286 days, Feb 13, '15 at 5:49pm, 3 users, 6 minutes.
Gantic, Ferret, weirdlike
Note: Earned by handicap.

2. 14! - 2135 pages / 937 days, Sep 08, '17 at 1:25pm, 3 users, 6 mins.
Moegreche, nichodemus, UnleashedUponMankind
Note: Earned by handicap.

USERS - 51 WINS
1. 100! - 537 (355) pages / 94 days, Aug 6, '14 at 9:28pm, 16 users, 14 hrs 33 mins.
apldeap123, Azywng, Crickster, Chryosten (as Darkfire45), Darktroop07, evilsweetblock, JACKinbigletters, kalkanadam, Loop_Stratos, MPH_Complexity, Omegap12, Patrick2011, R2D21999, Snag618, Tactical_Fish, Voyage2

LAST TWO WINS

50. 100! - February 12, '24, 11 users, 52 days.
sciller45 (5)[17], HalRazor [5], saint_of_gaming [5], JimSlaps (1)[2], TheMostManlyMan (1)[14], Solas128 [3], nichodemus (2)[9], Widestsinger [5], SirLegendary (2)[22], skater_kid_who_pwns, disastermaster30 (3)[5]

51. 100! - March 17, '24, 11 users, 35 days.
JimSlaps (1)[3], sciller45 (5)[18], saint_of_gaming [6], TheMostManlyMan (1)[15], Strop, skater_kid_who_pwns [2], GhostOfMatrix [4], WidestSinger (1)[6], HalRazor [6], SirLegendary (2)[23], Solas128 [4]

  • 78,643 Replies
SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,585 posts
Duke

58. Hello there @nichodemus, kinda missed seeing you around here!

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,832 posts
Chamberlain

59. As much as I really hate to say it, I think the days of browser games is no longer viable, not for AG anyway. Newer sites might be able to make it work, but a company like AG that's been around this long and had such success back in the day probably can't survive on browser games alone anymore. Sad as it is, I think their move to non-browser publisher was likely their best and only move.

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
667 posts
Shepherd

60. That's probably true unfortunately; however, in that case I would make a "The Best of Armor Games" free or inexpensive Steam release like what Ninja Kiwi has done and close the site entirely (yes I know it still makes a little money from the ads, but keeping it open under such circumstances doesn't feel respectful of the past or the very few logged in players who are left).

nichodemus
offline
nichodemus
14,990 posts
Grand Duke

61. Hello @SirLegendary , unfortunately life takes its toll! And my fav game on here is gone.

SirLegendary
offline
SirLegendary
16,585 posts
Duke

62. @nichodemus, had to check your profile to see what that was. Was it Dawn of the dragons?

Have you tried mob ways yet?

ALSO... I didn't realize the dice and flip a coin feature was back. Mob Wars? = Heads

COIN RESULTS
Mob Wars?
Heads
sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,872 posts
Chancellor

63. It's been back a long while. Did you play the CT500 forum games?

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,832 posts
Chamberlain

64. Issue is, AG doesn't really own most of the games that have been on here. That being said, I'm sure they still have the rights to John's games, as well as JoeyBetz and probably even Krin, which could still make for a very decent bundle offering

sciller45
offline
sciller45
2,872 posts
Chancellor

65. Do believe John's the CEO now.

B2B.

Widestsinger
offline
Widestsinger
361 posts
Bard

66. W John

dirtytrrd
offline
dirtytrrd
1 posts
Nomad

66

MysteryFighterJoe
offline
MysteryFighterJoe
5 posts
Shepherd

15. They recently got us hundreds back! https://armorgames.com/news/hundreds-of-old-games-are-back

TheMostManlyMan
offline
TheMostManlyMan
5,832 posts
Chamberlain

67. Not as familiar with the newer rules regarding ignoring spam, but I suppose I might as well continue on with the count until someone more knowledgeable shows up

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
667 posts
Shepherd

1. Well it looks like I'm going to have to restart then.

HalRazor
online
HalRazor
201 posts
Grand Duke

2. Wow, these numbers seemed as random as lottery numbers. By the way, is the english word raffle the same as lottery (I really mean raffle, not ruffle :-) )

saint_of_gaming
offline
saint_of_gaming
667 posts
Shepherd

3. In effect yes, although lottery has more of a millions of people sized connotation to it.

Showing 76906-76920 of 78643