Errm how exactly? Or are you reffering to kielzanies statement?
Yes, that's exactly my point. If the Palestinians should have back Israel, then all of the Western Hemisphere should be given back to the Indians, right?
actually, we SHOULD GIVE THE CALIFORNIAS AND TEXAS BACK TO MEXICO!! its not our land origanlly!! its just the corruption of America and the strength that took peoples land away and killed thousands of people. Being half latino, that offends and it should be given back to mexico. saying that now tell me whos the real terrorist?
, then all of the Western Hemisphere should be given back to the Indians, right?
Not exactly. It is slightly different. The UN gave Israel the land in the 50s, after the Palestinians had been living there for nearly 2000 years. Bearing in mind these are the days when imperialism and nconquerors are not tolerated. All the people you mentioned were conquered hundreds of years ago, in a compltely different age where might was right. Nowadays that isnt acceptable anymore. Moreover the Paelstinians themselves got very very little say in the matter when the UN was deciding it.
Well, if you listen to MECHA, I live in Mexico... But it's American land now, whether you like it or not!!!
And according to your logic, the Assyrians, the Chaldeans, the Babylonians, the Persians, the Greeks, the Macedonians, The Romans, and the Mongolians were all terrorists.
Not exactly. It is slightly different. The UN gave Israel the land in the 50s, after the Palestinians had been living there for nearly 2000 years. Bearing in mind these are the days when imperialism and nconquerors are not tolerated. All the people you mentioned were conquered hundreds of years ago, in a compltely different age where might was right. Nowadays that isnt acceptable anymore. Moreover the Paelstinians themselves got very very little say in the matter when the UN was deciding it.
What, and the Indians just gave the land over? You don't think all conquerors face resistance?
so is it right for any of u to call the people who are fighting for their land terrorists? the palistinians are being acussed of being terrorists and have just been fighting (but i dont think not really in the right way) but those others have conquered in the wrong way and had no rite in doing so. those nations have basically dissaperead and their wrong doings can not be un done
so is it right for any of u to call the people who are fighting for their land terrorists? the palistinians are being acussed of being terrorists and have just been fighting (but i dont think not really in the right way) but those others have conquered in the wrong way and had no rite in doing so. those nations have basically dissaperead and their wrong doings can not be un done
That's not what I'm talking about. All those groups I mentioned had ancient empires. The very definition of an empire is ruling over groups other than your own. And as you were calling conquering groups terrorists, that's what all that means, right? =)
