1. Science can't really prove anything.
[url=http://http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/431383/existence_of_god_4_reasons_that_support_pg3.html?cat=9]
Sorry RedAce, but you should no longer use this site as a source of information, as it is written by one person's "thoughts" on a matter such as this.
[quote=Website]
To this end, it is statistically possible to drop the deck of cards repeatedly until they once again enter a state of perfect entropy. Although the odds are tremendously slim, it is possible for such phenomenon to occur in a span of as much as 1 billion years. Although possible, this theory is impossible when applying it to living things. As stated before, the earth started with single cellular organisms, which in turn formed into multi-cellular organisms, and so on. For this reason, it is impossible for any form of species to "de-evolve," because multi-cellular organisms cannot regress back into single-cellular organisms. Therefore, as stated, a necessary helping hand is required to have existed, which is none other than God.[/quote]
This author is talking about a metaphor that insinuates dumping of matter and energy until it reaches a form of existence. Wow. Okay lemme clear this up:
1) First of all, the Earth did not start with unicellular organisms; it started off as matter. Chemicals formed together chains to create amino acids aka the blueprints for life. It formed into RNA, in which better parts of RNA were formed into DNA. This is bare minimum information. If you want me to give you details, I will.
2) Since when have matter and organisms paired up as being the same principle, therefore could go under the same conditions? You cannot do the same to matter in the same manner to organisms. Yes, you can break down matter and reassemble it-- we have done it before. If you break down an organism, they will die. I have do--woah....that was close...
3) De-Evolving? Since when has origins or evolution for that matter been on the basis of De-Evolving? If you mean De-Evolving as in taking what the present form of an organism is and literally tracing it back to its predecessor, then it can't be done. If you mean De-Evolving as in slowly, but surely reassembling an organism's genepools to the same conditions as its predecessor, then yes, it can be done. In this case, you are wrong in BOTH WAYS.
4) God does not need to intervene for a single progression; He only needs to start it. If the conditions needed to progress can be done by itself, then there does not need to be an intelligent being, true, or null, needed to intervene.
RedAce, this 'news article' is based off one man and his thoughts, not something that has undergone rigorous testing and controversy. If you have pulled up a site that has documented theories and/or evidence of such, then I may have considered it or partials of it meritable. This article is just...wow.
