Forums → WEPR → After Death?

He he he. When debating, never let your emotions get the better of you, as you have just now. Of course, what you've said before cannot be classed as debating, can it? Debating is a mature, well worded thing. The nonsense that comes from your trap, on the other hand, is immature, spiteful, ********.
I stand by my words, and I stand by the idea of an afterlife. Your claptrap won't change that, so what's the point of you talking, 314d1?

I stand by my words, and I stand by the idea of an afterlife. Your claptrap won't change that, so what's the point of you talking, 314d1?

Haha.. there is hardly stopping these boys now Santi. I do agree with a lot you have said though.

I feel that a lot of people have the wrong kind of mindset when it comes to discussion, and that is that one side wants to "convince the other" that they are incorrect, while they themselves are being immensely stubborn and unwanting to admit any weakness in their own theories. In a discussion I feel that both sides should keep an open mind towards the other side's counter points and actively evaluate the question with your new found knowledge. A discussion is a place where people should be able to relax, think and share their believes on the subject. I also believe that discussions like these should not get personal.

He he he. When debating, never let your emotions get the better of you, as you have just now.

Of course, what you've said before cannot be classed as debating, can it? Debating is a mature, well worded thing.

I stand by my words, and I stand by the idea of an afterlife. Your claptrap won't change that, so what's the point of you talking, 314d1?

In a discussion I feel that both sides should keep an open mind towards the other side's counter points and actively evaluate the question with your new found knowledge

Oh my god, some of you are actually trying to argue the person's phrase with logic and not looking at what is implied. The only reason something is illogical is because of logic itself. Once logic contradicts itself the previous logic is no longer valid, in practical terms. So if it is impossible to gain every bit of knowledge, logic itself is illogical, because there is, and I quote "...an infinite amount of knowledge". So arguing logic is basically arguing something you don't know if either argument is true, or any common hypothesis. Now your even cursing! well, i tried.

The only reason something is illogical is because of logic itself. Once logic contradicts itself the previous logic is no longer valid, in practical terms. So if it is impossible to gain every bit of knowledge, logic itself is illogical, because there is, and I quote "...an infinite amount of knowledge". So arguing logic is basically arguing something you don't know if either argument is true, or any common hypothesis

*takes a whiff*

It's all Santi's fault!

*passes on blunt*

It's all Santi's fault!

:P

*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*

*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*
*takes a whiff*

Oh my god, some of you are actually trying to argue the person's phrase with logic and not looking at what is implied.

The only reason something is illogical is because of logic itself.

Once logic contradicts itself the previous logic is no longer valid, in practical terms

So if it is impossible to gain every bit of knowledge, logic itself is illogical, because there is, and I quote "...an infinite amount of knowledge".

So arguing logic is basically arguing something you don't know if either argument is true, or any common hypothesis.

Now your even cursing!

well, i tried.

Oh, good on you, fools! Staying, or should I say straying on/off topic. I see this is going to get somewhere! Now, to those who don't know, much of that was sarcasm! Now you have degenerated this great topic into a discussion about logic. Seriously, what is wrong with you people? Do you not have lives, a dog to look after, a job to do? Can you not make sensical, meaningful conversations? Why turn this into a bloody debate where the only goal is to contradict everything the other side says without actually saying anything worthwhile.
*sigh*

First that's my line...sigh. Second, OK, sorry about the thing that I did trying to confuse you, let's just get back to talking about whatever you guys thinks happens after death. Third, 314d1, I was trying to explain, logic is impossible to fully understand, I wasn't challenging you, taunting you, act smarter, or anything, I just put that line in a post in a forum, and my bio, ok. Let's just get back to the topic. Thanks MasterForger, and to think this all started when I tried to stop comments that had nothing to do with the actual topic.

"ROBOCOP IS RIDING A UNICORN, THEREFOR YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALID!".

Second, OK, sorry about the thing that I did trying to confuse you, let's just get back to talking about whatever you guys thinks happens after death

Third, 314d1, I was trying to explain, logic is impossible to fully understand, I wasn't challenging you, taunting you, act smarter, or anything, I just put that line in a post in a forum, and my bio, ok. Let's just get back to the topic.

I believe there is a meme for that

[quote]"ROBOCOP IS RIDING A UNICORN, THEREFOR YOUR ARGUMENT IS INVALID!".

I believe there is a meme for that